|
Legal News
PERM Update
01/03/05
At long last, the PERM (Program Electronic Review Management) final rule
was published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2004. While we are
still digesting the 300-page document and will not know exactly how the
new system will work until after it is implemented on March 28, 2005,
we can provide some highlights of the new rule.
Filing
Under PERM, it will be possible to file labor certification applications
electronically using a special website or by mail to the National Processing
Center (NPC) in Chicago or Atlanta, using new application form ETA 9089.
For electronically filed applications the employer will sign the certified
form upon receipt from the DOL. The originally signed form must be submitted
with the I-140 immigrant visa petition. Applications filed by mail must
bear the original signature. A priority date will be assigned as of the
date of receipt, provided that the form is accepted for filing. The Department
of Labor (DOL) expects to adjudicate electronically filed applications
within 45 to 60 days of filing.
Recruitment
PERM recruitment is similar to current RIR procedures to the extent that
recruitment occurs prior to filing. Unlike RIR, however, PERM requires
a series of recruitment steps that must occur within a set timetable.
Further, the expanse of the required recruitment is affected by the nature
of the job. Professional jobs, defined as those for which a bachelor's
or higher degree is necessary for job performance, require additional
recruitment from a list of ten additional recruitment steps identified
by the DOL.
Print-media advertisements remain a requirement for PERM processing.
Employers must place two Sunday advertisements in newspapers of general
circulation in the area of intended employment, or in a professional journal
in lieu of one of the Sunday ads where occupationally appropriate. Ads
must identify the employer and the geographic area of the job and provide
enough information about the vacant position to inform U.S. workers of
the job opportunity. Ads need not list the wage offer or provide a detailed
description of the job or job requirements.
In addition to advertisements, employers are also expected to use normal
in-house recruiting procedures, whether in print or electronic form, and
PERM pre-filing recruitment requires the continued use of the traditional
internally posted job notice. PERM also requires that employers place
a thirty-day job order with the state workforce agency (SWA)
Prevailing Wages
Prevailing wage determination under PERM is identical to the prevailing
wage changes articulated for H-1B visa applications in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2005 that was signed into law on December 8, 2004.
The previously permitted 5% variance is eliminated and the wage offered
must be equal to or greater than the prevailing wage.
For prevailing wage determination purposes, the Occupational Employment
Statistics (OES) has been expanded from two to four levels using a mathematical
formula established for this purpose. Use of McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract
Act or Davis Bacon Act wages remain an option if applicable to the job,
as is the use of alternate surveys. Discretionary bonuses, commissions
and/or cost-of-living allowances may be included in determining the wage-offer,
but only if such payments are guaranteed by the employer. PERM also continues
to uphold the current regulation regarding the effective date for payment
of the prevailing wage, as the date that the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration
Service (USCIS) grants permanent residency or the date that the foreign
national employee is admitted to the U.S. to take up the certified job.
Recruitment Report
Similar to RIR processing PERM processing requires employers to prepare
a recruitment report summarizing the nature and result of the recruitment.
The DOL does not require employers to identify individual U.S. applicants
in the Report, but does require employers to include specific information
about rejected U.S. workers categorized by the lawful, job-related reasons
for disqualification.
PERM rules deem workers who lack a particular skill for job performance
as "qualified," if such workers can acquire the skill in a "reasonable
period" of on-the-job training. The final rule, however, eliminates
the current requirement that employers consider U.S. workers' experience,
training and/or education as the equivalent of a required academic degree.
PERM also retains to lesser or greater extent the use of the Business
Necessity standard to justify special requirements, alternative experience
requirements and experience gained on-the-job. Minimum requirements are
measured by the specific vocational preparation (SVP) code assigned to
the occupation as shown in the O*Net job zones.
Employers must retain documents used in support of the Report for five
years from the date of filing.
Converting Pending Cases
Conversion of pending labor certification cases without loss of the priority
date is available to the extent that an existing case may be withdrawn,
if the SWA has not already placed a job order, and re-filed under PERM
rules (including new recruitment, ads, job order, etc) within 210 days
of the request to withdraw. The re-filed application, however, must be
for what the DOL determines is an "identical job opportunity."
The final rule defines "identical job opportunity" as the same
employer, foreign national employee, job title, job location, job description
and minimum requirements, including any changes that may have been made
in response to a SWA assessment notice issued prior to the PERM effective
date of March 28, 2005.
To what extent, if any, data on a pending application may be amended
while still meeting the "identical" requirement, remains to
be seen. In addition to the drawback of costs associated with a new recruitment,
the danger in converting a pending case is the potential loss of the priority
date. If the DOL deems that the job opportunity is not identical, then
the application is not successfully re-filed and will be treated as a
new application with a new priority date. Now that the quota for third
preference employment-based immigration cases is closed for nationals
of China, India and the Philippines, the issue of retaining an early priority
date for these foreign nationals is an important consideration. Retaining
an early priority date is an equally important consideration where there
may be a need to extend an H-1B visa beyond the six-year limit.
Pending applications not withdrawn after March 28, 2005 will be processed
under current labor certification rules in Backlog Reduction Centers (BRC)
and, until the implementation date, at the DOL regional offices or NPCs.
The BRCs have now started to issue Center Receipt Notification Letters,
so we are beginning to see movement on pending cases that have been transferred
to either the Dallas or Philadelphia BRC. The processing dates for current
cases will continue to be posted on the DOL website.
Audit Component
The DOL may audit labor certification applications. Audits may be done
for cause or randomly for quality control purposes. Where an application
is selected for audit, the Certifying Officer (CO) of the relevant NPC
will issue a letter specifying additional documentation that must be submitted.
PERM provides a thirty-day response time, with the opportunity of one
thirty-day extension. The DOL will deny the application if response is
not timely received. No administrative or judicial recourse is available.
Upon receipt of the requested documentation, the CO may at his/her discretion
require the employer to conduct a supervised recruitment. Where an employer
fails to respond to a request for additional documentation the CO may
require that employer to conduct supervised recruitment for future labor
certification applications for a period of two years.
Adjudication
The National Certifying Officer (NCO) and the NPC COs have the authority
to approve or deny labor certification applications. The standard for
approval remains essentially the same as under current rules, i.e. whether
or not the employer has demonstrated the unavailability of qualified,
able and willing U.S. workers for a specific job at a stated location
and whether employing the foreign national will adversely affect the wages
or working conditions of U.S. workers similarly employed.
The employer will be notified of the determination either electronically
or by mail. If certification is granted, the CO sends the certified application
and the Final Determination letter to the employer, or the designated
agent. If labor certification is denied, the employer may request a review
by the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) within thirty
days of the date of the determination. If the employer does not request
a review, a new application may be filed at any time, but if review is
requested a new application for the same job on behalf of the same foreign
national employee may not be filed until the review process is completed.
Although the DOL may certify an application, it may still be invalidated
by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of State
(DOS), or by a court on grounds of fraud or willful misrepresentation
of a material fact involving the labor certification application. Where
fraud or willful misrepresentation is discovered prior to approval, the
CO will refer the matter to DHS for investigation and provide a copy to
the DOL Office of Inspector General. If no criminal indictment or information
is initiated within ninety days, the CO may continue to process the application.
The CO, in consultation with the NCO may also revoke an approved application
if subsequent to approval certification is deemed unjustifiable. The employer,
however, must receive notice of the intent to revoke specifying the grounds
for revocation and be given an opportunity to rebut.
Conclusion
These are some of the highlights of PERM processing. All in all, the
final rule is not as harsh as the proposed rule was and if processing
times will be as fast as projected by the DOL, then PERM certainly will
be welcome. We are, however, still early in the process for a definitive
assessment of the PERM program. Questions will come up, as will the need
for DOL interpretation and term definition, as we get more familiar with
the program.
In the meantime, our office is moving forward with PERM rule recruitment
in preparation for filing cases as of March 28, 2005. We are also completing
RIR cases that are in progress at this time, which cases will be filed
under current rule.
|